Something I observed in the debates last night that I felt was interesting is the division that has grown between the democratic candidates. It seems like Edwards and Obama have labeled themselves the "agents of change" in the party and have attacked Clinton as being the "status quo." Richardson appears to either be on Clinton's side or simply believes the democratic candidates should remain united. The debate last night appeared, at least to me, like it was Obama and Edwards vs. Clinton and Richardson.
Now, a new poll in New Hampshire shows Obama surging ahead of Clinton (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/06/nh.poll/index.html) and it looks like the "change" message is resonating not only in Iowa but in New Hampshire as well. The battle has become over which candidate really will "change" America, and it looks like Obama is getting his message across more efficiently.
I'm not a democrat (independent conservative is how I classify myself) but I am finding the hostility between Clinton and Obama + Edwards (possible VP?) fascinating. Much more interesting than Romney and McCain's bickering.
Posted on: 01-06-2008, 6:06 PM , Last edited: 01-06-2008, 6:07 PM
Now, a new poll in New Hampshire shows Obama surging ahead of Clinton (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/06/nh.poll/index.html) and it looks like the "change" message is resonating not only in Iowa but in New Hampshire as well. The battle has become over which candidate really will "change" America, and it looks like Obama is getting his message across more efficiently.
I'm not a democrat (independent conservative is how I classify myself) but I am finding the hostility between Clinton and Obama + Edwards (possible VP?) fascinating. Much more interesting than Romney and McCain's bickering.




